Right now no one at CNN or Newsweek can verify if this is doctored but @Brian Stelter is definitely worried this could lead many viewers to think otherwise.
Are you kidding me - Buttigieg is CENTER? Supports abortion until a baby's first breath. Taxpayer funded "free" health insurance for illegal immigrants. Supports reparations. Eliminate Electoral College. No Such thing as moderate/center Democrat.
Release these transcripts! What are the Democrats hiding? "What [the American people] also haven't seen yet are FOUR transcripts of people who have already been deposed, which means under House rules we cannot use that testimony in these proceedings." - @Rep. Jim Jordan
Corrupt Adam Schiff “has carefully orchestrated an attempted coup against the man who 63 million Americans elected as our president.” “Schiff’s desperate political attack on @Donald J. Trump has been exposed as nothing more than a witch hunt” My op-Ed ⬇️ https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.foxnews.com/opinion/kayleigh-mcenany-in-televised-trump-impeachment...
Having practically every inch of the paper devoted to cheering the sham impeachment is evidently not good enough for the @The Washington Post. Nope. Now they’ve got their FASHION CRITIC on the case! Shockingly they pan the GOP & rave about the Dem witnesses. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2019/11/13/love-dignity-civility-jim-jordan-put-jacket/
More selective leaks from private depositions handed to Adam Schiff's favorite stenographers at CNN.
“This has been a complete waste of everyone’s time and a disservice to the taxpayers.” @Kayleigh McEnany
The sound you hear is the entire Democrat impeachment narrative collapsing. Ukraine foreign minister: “I have never seen a direct link between investigations and security assistance.” In other words, everything Dems are yelping about ... never happened. https://thehill.com/policy/international/europe/470415-top-ukrainian-official-sondland-did-not-expli...
Democrats: impeachment isn’t political, we are following the facts. Also Democrats: let’s do a poll to figure out what we should accuse the president of.
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-calls-trumps-actions-bribery-as-democrats-sharpen-cas...
Rallying in Louisiana, @Donald J. Trump blasts Dems for the ongoing sham impeachment. The crowd loves the big news of the day: Ukraine foreign minister says military aid was never connected to investigations by Ukraine. Whole Dem narrative is blown up! https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill.com/policy/international/europe/470415-top-ukrainian-official-s...
In a fact check of yesterday’s hearing, @The Washington Post can only find time for Republicans. How about @Mike Quigley’s claim that “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct”? Can’t even discuss Schiff’s claim he doesn’t know ID of “whistleblower”? https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/11/14/fact-checking-opening-day-trump-impeachment-hearings
Oh, boy. This might cause some folks to get “Triggered.” Debuting at #1 on the New York Times best sellers list. You know that was painful for them. Way to go @Donald Trump Jr.!
Every once in a while a Democrat accidentally tells the truth about what they’re trying to do.
Hearsay is definitely much better if you want to create a false basis for removing a duly-elected President.
Ouch. 🔥🔥🔥 @Rep. Jim Jordan smokes it here. "We got six people having four conversations in one sentence, and you just told me this is where you got your clear understanding."